RMS Health Advisors · Practice Visibility Index
Q4 2026 editionUpdated quarterly · next update January 2027

Austin Functional Medicine, PLLC

Austin · Medical clinic · austinfmc.com

#3
of 65 practices in Austin
70visibility score, out of 100
Google search45% of score
76
Ranks on Google’s first page for 18 searches that don’t include its name.
AI answers30% of score
43
Named in 6.9% of the 420 AI answers we collected for Austin.
Map results25% of score
89
In Google’s top-3 map results for 7 of 8 searches made near its address.
Its strongest channel is map results; its biggest gap is AI answers.

#1 in Austin: Wiseman Family Practice - Cedar Park, score 77.

Gap report

Where the gaps are

Where Austin Functional Medicine, PLLC falls behind its competitors on Google, in AI answers and in condition searches, and what to publish to close the gap.

Compared with your closest competitors (Wiseman Family Practice - Cedar Park, West Holistic Medicine, Lake Travis Integrative Medicine and others), we found:

1
condition searches where they rank on Google’s first page and you don’t
15
patient questions where AI assistants recommend them, never you
211
health searches they rank for that you don’t
3
content recommendations, based on those gaps

Get the full gap report for Austin Functional Medicine, PLLC

Who’s beating you, on which searches and patient questions, and what to publish first.

We’ll also send a short alert when this practice’s numbers change in a future quarterly update. Unsubscribe anytime.

Nearby in the ranking
#PracticeScore
1Wiseman Family Practice - Cedar ParkCedar Park77
2West Holistic MedicineAustin74
3Austin Functional Medicine, PLLCAustin70
4Lake Travis Integrative MedicineAustin69
5Austin MedicineAustin67

Want to close these gaps?

RMS Health Advisors helps independent practices get found on Google and recommended by AI assistants. A 30-minute call is free and comes with no obligation.

Book a 30-minute call

Scores measure online visibility, not quality of care. Is this your practice and something looks wrong? Tell us.