RMS Health Advisors · Practice Visibility Index
Q4 2026 editionUpdated quarterly · next update January 2027

Dr. Sandra Roy, ND (Dr. S)

Los Angeles · Naturopathic practitioner · dr-s.one

#57
of 85 practices in Los Angeles
14visibility score, out of 100
Google search45% of score
0
Doesn’t rank on Google’s first page for any tracked search beyond its own name.
AI answers30% of score
0
Not named in any of the 420 AI answers we collected for Los Angeles.
Map results25% of score
56
In Google’s top-3 map results for 6 of 8 searches made near its address.
None of the four AI assistants named this practice in any of the 420 answers we collected for Los Angeles.

#1 in Los Angeles: Vitality Integrative Medicine, score 86.

Gap report

Where the gaps are

Where Dr. Sandra Roy, ND (Dr. S) falls behind its competitors on Google, in AI answers and in condition searches, and what to publish to close the gap.

Compared with the practices ranked just above you (Farahnik Integrative Functional Medicine - West Hollywood, VITALIZE Natural Medicine, Bell Holistic Center Inc. and others), we found:

0
condition searches where they rank on Google’s first page and you don’t
2
patient questions where AI assistants recommend them, never you
0
health searches they rank for that you don’t
1
content recommendations, based on those gaps

Get the full gap report for Dr. Sandra Roy, ND (Dr. S)

Who’s beating you, on which searches and patient questions, and what to publish first.

We’ll also send a short alert when this practice’s numbers change in a future quarterly update. Unsubscribe anytime.

Nearby in the ranking
#PracticeScore
55Quantum HealthVenice15
56The Joy of HealingLakewood14
57Dr. Sandra Roy, ND (Dr. S)Los Angeles14
58Karma Holistic CenterLos Angeles13
59Dr. Nicole Fujiyama, ND, LAcTorrance13

Want to close these gaps?

RMS Health Advisors helps independent practices get found on Google and recommended by AI assistants. A 30-minute call is free and comes with no obligation.

Book a 30-minute call

Scores measure online visibility, not quality of care. Is this your practice and something looks wrong? Tell us.