RMS Health Advisors · Practice Visibility Index
Q4 2026 editionUpdated quarterly · next update January 2027

Danielle Gran, ND, MSCP

El Segundo · Naturopathic practitioner · drdaniellegran.com

#19
of 85 practices in Los Angeles
50visibility score, out of 100
Google search45% of score
49
Ranks on Google’s first page for 6 searches that don’t include its name.
AI answers30% of score
36
Named in 3.1% of the 420 AI answers we collected for Los Angeles.
Map results25% of score
70
In Google’s top-3 map results for 8 of 8 searches made near its address.
Its strongest channel is map results; its biggest gap is AI answers.

#1 in Los Angeles: Vitality Integrative Medicine, score 86.

Gap report

Where the gaps are

Where Danielle Gran, ND, MSCP falls behind its competitors on Google, in AI answers and in condition searches, and what to publish to close the gap.

Compared with the practices ranked just above you (Natural Holistic Center, Integrative Natural Medical Clinic, Dr. Amaliya Santiago, Holtorf Medical Group and others), we found:

0
condition searches where they rank on Google’s first page and you don’t
9
patient questions where AI assistants recommend them, never you
53
health searches they rank for that you don’t
2
content recommendations, based on those gaps

Get the full gap report for Danielle Gran, ND, MSCP

Who’s beating you, on which searches and patient questions, and what to publish first.

We’ll also send a short alert when this practice’s numbers change in a future quarterly update. Unsubscribe anytime.

Nearby in the ranking
#PracticeScore
17Center for Natural Family MedicineLos Angeles51
18Naturopathic Medicine InstituteGlendale50
19Danielle Gran, ND, MSCPEl Segundo50
20PRO HEALTH NATURAL CENTERHuntington Park50
21Julie Taylor MD Center for Functional MedicinePasadena50

Want to close these gaps?

RMS Health Advisors helps independent practices get found on Google and recommended by AI assistants. A 30-minute call is free and comes with no obligation.

Book a 30-minute call

Scores measure online visibility, not quality of care. Is this your practice and something looks wrong? Tell us.