RMS Health Advisors · Practice Visibility Index
Q4 2026 editionUpdated quarterly · next update January 2027

Dr. Radha Sinha, ND EAMP/LAc

Kirkland · Naturopathic practitioner · drradhasinha.com

#46
of 131 practices in Seattle
38visibility score, out of 100
Google search45% of score
20
Ranks on Google’s first page for 1 search that don’t include its name.
AI answers30% of score
50
Named in 3.1% of the 420 AI answers we collected for Seattle.
Map results25% of score
56
In Google’s top-3 map results for 7 of 8 searches made near its address.
It shows up in Google’s map results near its own address, but rarely for potential patients searching from elsewhere in Seattle.

#1 in Seattle: Cascade Integrative Medicine, score 99.

Gap report

Where the gaps are

Where Dr. Radha Sinha, ND EAMP/LAc falls behind its competitors on Google, in AI answers and in condition searches, and what to publish to close the gap.

Compared with the practices ranked just above you (Lynnwood Natural Medicine, Roots Naturopathic Medicine, Water's Edge Natural Medicine and others), we found:

3
condition searches where they rank on Google’s first page and you don’t
6
patient questions where AI assistants recommend them, never you
32
health searches they rank for that you don’t
3
content recommendations, based on those gaps

Get the full gap report for Dr. Radha Sinha, ND EAMP/LAc

Who’s beating you, on which searches and patient questions, and what to publish first.

We’ll also send a short alert when this practice’s numbers change in a future quarterly update. Unsubscribe anytime.

Nearby in the ranking
#PracticeScore
44Vitae Health CenterLynnwood38
45Northwest Integrative MedicineKirkland38
46Dr. Radha Sinha, ND EAMP/LAcKirkland38
47Sapunar NaturopathicRenton37
48Vitality Integrative CareSeattle37

Want to close these gaps?

RMS Health Advisors helps independent practices get found on Google and recommended by AI assistants. A 30-minute call is free and comes with no obligation.

Book a 30-minute call

Scores measure online visibility, not quality of care. Is this your practice and something looks wrong? Tell us.