RMS Health Advisors · Practice Visibility Index
Q4 2026 editionUpdated quarterly · next update January 2027

Neighborhood Naturopathic and Primary Care

Seattle · Medical clinic · neighborhood-naturopathic.com

#2
of 131 practices in Seattle
87visibility score, out of 100
Google search45% of score
100
Ranks on Google’s first page for 241 searches that don’t include its name.
AI answers30% of score
73
Named in 4.5% of the 420 AI answers we collected for Seattle.
Map results25% of score
80
In Google’s top-3 map results for 5 of 8 searches made near its address.
Its strongest channel is Google search; its biggest gap is AI answers.

#1 in Seattle: Cascade Integrative Medicine, score 99.

Gap report

Where the gaps are

Where Neighborhood Naturopathic and Primary Care falls behind its competitors on Google, in AI answers and in condition searches, and what to publish to close the gap.

Compared with your closest competitors (Cascade Integrative Medicine, Seattle Integrative Medicine, Sage Integrative Medicine Clinic and others), we found:

5
condition searches where they rank on Google’s first page and you don’t
16
patient questions where AI assistants recommend them, never you
70
health searches they rank for that you don’t
3
content recommendations, based on those gaps

Get the full gap report for Neighborhood Naturopathic and Primary Care

Who’s beating you, on which searches and patient questions, and what to publish first.

We’ll also send a short alert when this practice’s numbers change in a future quarterly update. Unsubscribe anytime.

Nearby in the ranking
#PracticeScore
1Cascade Integrative MedicineIssaquah99
2Neighborhood Naturopathic and Primary CareSeattle87
3Seattle Integrative MedicineSeattle85
4Sage Integrative Medicine ClinicEdmonds84
5Village Medicine SeattleSeattle76

Want to close these gaps?

RMS Health Advisors helps independent practices get found on Google and recommended by AI assistants. A 30-minute call is free and comes with no obligation.

Book a 30-minute call

Scores measure online visibility, not quality of care. Is this your practice and something looks wrong? Tell us.