RMS Health Advisors · Practice Visibility Index
Q4 2026 editionUpdated quarterly · next update January 2027

Roots Naturopathic Medicine

Seattle · Medical clinic · rootsnaturopathic.com

#42
of 131 practices in Seattle
40visibility score, out of 100
Google search45% of score
77
Ranks on Google’s first page for 16 searches that don’t include its name.
AI answers30% of score
4
Named in 0.2% of the 420 AI answers we collected for Seattle.
Map results25% of score
16
In Google’s top-3 map results for 1 of 8 searches made near its address.
AI assistants named this practice only when patients asked about “Seattle.” Asked the same questions about the rest of the area, they recommended other practices.

#1 in Seattle: Cascade Integrative Medicine, score 99.

Gap report

Where the gaps are

Where Roots Naturopathic Medicine falls behind its competitors on Google, in AI answers and in condition searches, and what to publish to close the gap.

Compared with the practices ranked just above you (Fern Cove Natural Medicine, Roots for Health, New Health Medical Center and others), we found:

0
condition searches where they rank on Google’s first page and you don’t
7
patient questions where AI assistants recommend them, never you
19
health searches they rank for that you don’t
3
content recommendations, based on those gaps

Get the full gap report for Roots Naturopathic Medicine

Who’s beating you, on which searches and patient questions, and what to publish first.

We’ll also send a short alert when this practice’s numbers change in a future quarterly update. Unsubscribe anytime.

Nearby in the ranking
#PracticeScore
40One Sky Family MedicineSeattle40
41Lynnwood Natural MedicineLynnwood40
42Roots Naturopathic MedicineSeattle40
43Water's Edge Natural MedicineSeattle39
44Vitae Health CenterLynnwood38

Want to close these gaps?

RMS Health Advisors helps independent practices get found on Google and recommended by AI assistants. A 30-minute call is free and comes with no obligation.

Book a 30-minute call

Scores measure online visibility, not quality of care. Is this your practice and something looks wrong? Tell us.