RMS Health Advisors · Practice Visibility Index
Q4 2026 editionUpdated quarterly · next update January 2027

Think Functional Medicine

Renton · Medical clinic · seattlefunctionalmedicine.com

#13
of 131 practices in Seattle
60visibility score, out of 100
Google search45% of score
94
Ranks on Google’s first page for 1 search that don’t include its name.
AI answers30% of score
0
Not named in any of the 420 AI answers we collected for Seattle.
Map results25% of score
72
In Google’s top-3 map results for 4 of 8 searches made near its address.
Google ranks this practice well, but none of the four AI assistants named it in any of the 420 answers we collected for Seattle.

#1 in Seattle: Cascade Integrative Medicine, score 99.

Gap report

Where the gaps are

Where Think Functional Medicine falls behind its competitors on Google, in AI answers and in condition searches, and what to publish to close the gap.

Compared with the practices ranked just above you (Seattle Integrative Hormone & Thyroid Clinic, Teresa Richter, ND, Aria Integrative Medicine and others), we found:

5
condition searches where they rank on Google’s first page and you don’t
33
patient questions where AI assistants recommend them, never you
112
health searches they rank for that you don’t
3
content recommendations, based on those gaps

Get the full gap report for Think Functional Medicine

Who’s beating you, on which searches and patient questions, and what to publish first.

We’ll also send a short alert when this practice’s numbers change in a future quarterly update. Unsubscribe anytime.

Nearby in the ranking
#PracticeScore
11Connect Integrative MedicineEdmonds61
12North Seattle Natural MedicineEdmonds61
13Think Functional MedicineRenton60
14Bukant NaturopathicKirkland60
15Interactive Health ClinicLynnwood58

Want to close these gaps?

RMS Health Advisors helps independent practices get found on Google and recommended by AI assistants. A 30-minute call is free and comes with no obligation.

Book a 30-minute call

Scores measure online visibility, not quality of care. Is this your practice and something looks wrong? Tell us.