RMS Health Advisors · Practice Visibility Index
Q4 2026 editionUpdated quarterly · next update January 2027

GW Center for Integrative Medicine

Washington · Medical clinic · gwcim.com

#6
of 100 practices in Washington, DC
88visibility score, out of 100
Google search45% of score
100
Ranks on Google’s first page for 80 searches that don’t include its name.
AI answers30% of score
100
Named in 14.1% of the 420 AI answers we collected for Washington, DC.
Map results25% of score
52
In Google’s top-3 map results for 5 of 8 searches made near its address.
Its strongest channel is Google search; its biggest gap is map results.

#1 in Washington, DC: Nava Health & Vitality Center, score 99.

Gap report

Where the gaps are

Where GW Center for Integrative Medicine falls behind its competitors on Google, in AI answers and in condition searches, and what to publish to close the gap.

Compared with the practices ranked just above you (Nava Health & Vitality Center, National Integrated Health Associates (NIHA), Dignity Integrative Health & Wellness and others), we found:

1
condition searches where they rank on Google’s first page and you don’t
2
patient questions where AI assistants recommend them, never you
350
health searches they rank for that you don’t
3
content recommendations, based on those gaps

Get the full gap report for GW Center for Integrative Medicine

Who’s beating you, on which searches and patient questions, and what to publish first.

We’ll also send a short alert when this practice’s numbers change in a future quarterly update. Unsubscribe anytime.

Nearby in the ranking
#PracticeScore
4Kaplan Center for Integrative MedicineMcLean91
5Capital Integrative HealthPotomac88
6GW Center for Integrative MedicineWashington88
7Thrive NaturopathicAlexandria76
8Northern Virginia Functional MedicineSterling76

Want to close these gaps?

RMS Health Advisors helps independent practices get found on Google and recommended by AI assistants. A 30-minute call is free and comes with no obligation.

Book a 30-minute call

Scores measure online visibility, not quality of care. Is this your practice and something looks wrong? Tell us.