RMS Health Advisors · Practice Visibility Index
Q4 2026 editionUpdated quarterly · next update January 2027

Integrative Family Medicine

Olney · Alternative medicine practitioner · mdfamilyphysician.com

#32
of 100 practices in Washington, DC
44visibility score, out of 100
Google search45% of score
38
Ranks on Google’s first page for 1 search that don’t include its name.
AI answers30% of score
6
Named in 0.5% of the 420 AI answers we collected for Washington, DC.
Map results25% of score
100
In Google’s top-3 map results for 8 of 8 searches made near its address.
Its strongest channel is map results; its biggest gap is AI answers.

#1 in Washington, DC: Nava Health & Vitality Center, score 99.

Gap report

Where the gaps are

Where Integrative Family Medicine falls behind its competitors on Google, in AI answers and in condition searches, and what to publish to close the gap.

Compared with the practices ranked just above you (Karen Threlkel Naturopathic Doctor, Osteopathic Center for Healing, Washington Institute of Natural Medicine and others), we found:

3
condition searches where they rank on Google’s first page and you don’t
6
patient questions where AI assistants recommend them, never you
40
health searches they rank for that you don’t
3
content recommendations, based on those gaps

Get the full gap report for Integrative Family Medicine

Who’s beating you, on which searches and patient questions, and what to publish first.

We’ll also send a short alert when this practice’s numbers change in a future quarterly update. Unsubscribe anytime.

Nearby in the ranking
#PracticeScore
30Dr. Charlene KannankerilWashington44
31Turning Point Integrative Health CenterColumbia44
32Integrative Family MedicineOlney44
33All Natural Medicine Clinic, LLCRockville42
34Dr. Anne BerkeleyWashington42

Want to close these gaps?

RMS Health Advisors helps independent practices get found on Google and recommended by AI assistants. A 30-minute call is free and comes with no obligation.

Book a 30-minute call

Scores measure online visibility, not quality of care. Is this your practice and something looks wrong? Tell us.